Unlocking Real Value Blog

Investment Manager Merger Mania Set to Begin? - March 19th, 2010

It was announced earlier this week that two Boston-Based investment managers – Congress Asset Management and Prelude Asset Management – were set to merge (Boston-Based Asset Managers Combine Forces). The combined firm will have approximately $6.4 billion under management.

Intriguing is the question of whether this portends the beginning of a wave of mergers in the industry. Personally, I think that it does. It was almost exactly a year ago in fact that I wrote about this topic (see blog of March 7, 2009 – Crisis Hurts Small Managers Most). I guess my timing was a little off, but in retrospect it makes sense – firms wanted to give it more time following the economic meltdown before they considered alternatives and as the market rose last year so did optimism.

But we continue to operate in a very difficult economic environment, and I think it is inevitable that many investment management firms will see the benefit of merging – certainly from an operations point of view. But these synergies will also exist in other areas such as marketing and sales. Prelude had about $1.2 million in AUM at the time of the merger. As I predicted a year ago, it is the managers below $2 billion that are the most vulnerable. Here we are a year later – get ready to see a lot more announcements.

One last thought – one positive is that last year’s market rise (and accompanying rise in AUM) will probably save some jobs, as firms are feeling better than they were a year ago and are probably in better financial shape. But the overall rationale for merging remains.

Top Ten Reasons to Read “The Digital Handshake” - March 13th, 2010

(This is the first in a series of book reviews that will be featured on the blog that I believe are relevant to our community.)

“The Digital Handshake – Seven Proven Strategies to Grow Your Business Using Social Media” by Paul Chaney (www.thedigitalhandshake.com).

Recommendation: Buy this book today! I have read more books than I care to remember on social media and without a doubt this is the best of the bunch – by a large margin.

Top Ten Reasons to Read “The Digital Handshake” by Paul Chaney:

Number 10: It is well written and well organized. Sounds funny to say this, but I find so many of the books written on social media hard to read and I come away not sure who the audience is supposed to be.

Number 9: It is comprehensive – Paul covers every conceivable type of social media available today and explains where each fits (and where they don’t fit).

Number 8: It is chocked full of example and references – rather than bog the reader down in excessively long explanations, references are made to where the reader can go for further information.

Number 7: It puts social media into context. The book begins with a great overview of the 5 consumer trends that are turning the business world upside down.

Number 6: It has a point of view. In addition to covering social media in a very comprehensive way, Paul gives his opinion of the relative merits of the various alternatives in each category.

Number 5: It addresses the question of how to measure the effectiveness of your social media efforts so that you can determine if you are spending your time wisely.

Number 4: It helps you develop a plan of action before jumping in. For example, rather than just starting a blog, Paul walks you through the process of how to plan for your blog first so that your efforts will be more successful.

Number 3: It answers the question of how Facebook and Twitter (among others) are relevant to business! This was huge for me because I could never figure out how and if these were social media venue I wanted to pursue.

Number 2: It motivates you to learn! The book makes you want to try things that you have never considered before. Now, none of us can do them all at once, but the ideas will now be in the back of your mind and you will have a reference guide to refer to when ready.

Number 1: IT IS RELEVANT TO PROFESSIONALS IN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY. I have finished most books on social media feeling like they were not talking to me – a small business owner in a specialized industry. I have implemented more ideas from this book in just writing this blog than in all of the previous social media books that I have read! (For example, did you know that search items like lists?)

“Fiduciary” From the Client’s Point of View - March 11th, 2010

The issue of which advisors will ultimately be held to fiduciary standards  is bound to continue into the foreseeable future. Clients, however, are more concerned with how you – their advisor – is looking after their particular interests now.

How do you demonstrate to your clients that all of your actions are in their best interest? A good place to start is by looking at the message of  The Committee for the Fiduciary Standard. These principles, or some variation of them, should be part of your Mission Statement, Value Proposition and the stated principles which govern how you operate your business. First – talk the talk – it will help differentiate you from the competition.

Then you must walk the walk – your actions must follow your words. Here is a little quiz. Is it ethical to say to a client “I charge a fee of 1% of the value of your investment portfolio, a fee much lower than many of my competitors”? This statement is misleading because it fails to mention the costs that are associated with the actual investments – the client’s  total cost. In fact, it is likely that the total cost the client pays will be the same as, or close to, what the competition charges in an “apples to apples” comparison. This example demonstrates actions which are contrary to the principle of fully disclosing all information to the client. Your actions affect your clients much more than any proposed legislation!

Demonstrate your value-added to your clients and always follow-through on your commitments. Then all of this talk about who is and who is not a fiduciary is less likely to distract and sidetrack you (and your clients).

To Be a Fiduciary … Or Not To Be a Fiduciary? - March 8th, 2010

The March 3rd article in the New York Times entitled Trusted Advisor or Stock Pusher? Finance Bill May Not Settle It raised the public profile of an issue that has been swirling around the financial services reform debate for a long time – should advisors in the brokerage industry be held to fiduciary standards (as RIAs are)? The title and content of this piece miss a few very important points:

1) Just because you’re not held to fiduciary standards, you’re not a stock pusher! There are many qualified advisors at brokerage firms, and their motives and reputations should not be questioned just because of where they work. Criticism of the industry is in vogue today – but  we shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that there are many qualified advisors out there helping clients.

2) No new regulation (Bill) and no standards are assurance of quality. Clients must still assess whether the advisor that they have chosen is truly acting in their best interest. And advisors must be able to proactively demonstrate to clients – regardless of whether are are a fiduciary by law or not – how they act in the best interest of their clients.

Our next blog will focus on what advisors can do to make their case to clients.

The Unlocking Real Value Blog is Here! - March 6th, 2010

I would like to welcome you to the AK Advisory Partners blog. I hope that you will become part of my community and visit and comment often.

I have started this blog as a place for financial services professionals to read and comment on thought-provoking ideas that affect them and their businesses. Whether your are an advisor, money manager or professional at a sponsor firm (broker/dealer, bank, mutual fund company or insurance company), this blog will provide information of relevance to your everyday life.

Enjoy!

Will Active ETFs Woo Non-Indexers? - February 19th, 2010

Published in Ignites – An Information Service of Money-Media, a Financial Times Company
Written by Andy Klausner, CIMA, CIS, the founder of AK Advisory Partners LLC., a strategic consultancy serving the wealth management industry.

I believe active ETFs will likely have an advantage in attracting more interest to passive strategies in the intermediary market as opposed to the direct investor space. Consider how advisors are making decisions for clients, either on a discretionary or non-discretionary basis, on which traditional equity or fixed-income mutual fund meets their needs. It’s very logical that an advisor would see benefits in an active ETF with cost advantages when compared to mutual funds, particularly if the advisor’s overall investment preference is for low-cost products and active management. The proliferation of sector- and commodity-specific ETFs at significantly lower costs than comparable mutual funds (when available) also bodes well for the continued growth in ETFs.

However, for many investors that go it themselves, I don’t think they know or understand the difference between active and passive ETFs. They view ETFs as a way to invest in the “market” and ETFs allow investments into specific sectors and commodities (for example, gold). ETFs are an alternative to mutual funds that allow for trading throughout the day as opposed to at NAV only once a day. I think this segment of the market has increased itsparticipation in this segment of the market and will continue to do so. This will be especiallythe case as firms such as Charles Schwab and others decrease the cost of trading. I am not sure that active v. passive is an issue for this group.

Poll: Sales is Top Hiring Priority for 2010 - January 27th, 2010

Published on Jan 27, 2010 – FUNDfire – An Information Service of Money-Media, a Financial Times Company
By Gregory Shulas

A new wealth firm with offices in Florida and Ohio launched last month catering to high-net worth clients with investment and family office services, as well as an affiliated law practice. The three partners – former private bankers and directors with National City Bank and its Sterling multi-family office division – opened shop on Dec. 18 aiming to serve clients with more than $5 million.

Asset management firms are making sales professionals their top recruitment priority this year amid growing signs that the once-frozen job market is thawing.

That’s according to a FundFire reader poll where roughly 37% of respondents said money managers want to add to their sales and marketing workforces in 2010, making that the most popular job category in the survey.

That vote total included 25% who said institutional sales and marketing positions are the top hiring focus at their firm, and 12% who indicated that bringing on retail wholesalers is the most important recruitment goal.

Investment professionals, including portfolio managers and analysts, received the second highest number of votes, with 16 overall. Technology and operations garnered 11%, while product development and compliance received 6% each.

About 25% of respondents said their firm is either not hiring or plans further layoffs. In spite of that, the survey offers some evidence that the long dormant job market is beginning to wake up.

A FundFire poll early last year found 64% of respondents saying their money management firms were not increasing staffing levels in any areas for the upcoming year. A nearly identical percentage, about 63%, maintained that view in an August FundFire survey on whether companies were expanding payroll again or were keeping the status quo.

Goldman Sachs, General Electric Asset Management and T. Rowe Price are just some of the managers that in recent months have revealed plans to increase staffing in the near term. Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein said in November that expanding institutional and private wealth sales coverage is a priority. GE Asset Management announced this month that it will hire its first U.K.-based consultant relations specialist as part of a broader institutional consultant channel push.

FundFire has also reported that recruiters are actively recruiting for fixed income investment professionals. Of specific interest are investments specialists from the Treasury, high-grade, mortgage and distressed credit spaces.

Jacob Navon, partner at recruitment firm Westwood Partners, has seen encouraging signs of life in the industry’s job market, with sales and investments standing out as strong points.

“We are seeing a more balanced mix between demand for investment professionals and demand for sales, marketing and client service personnel across the major distribution channels,” he says. “The major point, however, is that there is a strong and widespread race for talent in these two segments of the business.”

Andy Klausner, founder of strategic consultancy AK Advisory Partners, says firms are focusing on sales professionals before they beef up their investment staffs.

“By adding sales professionals who are presumably paid to a large degree on commission,they can hedge their bets while still trying to grow their business. In addition, the emphasis on institutional versus retail reflects the reality that the institutional marketplace is less affected by current economic conditions than retail,” Klausner says.

As of 3 p.m. Tuesday, 101 FundFire subscribers had participated in the poll. Participants were self-selected and were only able to vote once. FundFire’s primary audience consists of asset managers, institutional investors, consultants, financial advisors and service providers.

Wirehouse Poaching Fuel’s Young Firm’s Growth - November 23rd, 2009

Published inFUNDfire – An Information Service of Money-Media, a Financial Times Company
By Tom Stabile

Two former UBS Financial advisors recently joined the ranks at HighTower, a Chicago-based boutique brokerage start-up that is aiming to “double or triple” its roster in the next two years by poaching from the wirehouses. Christopher Davis of Virginia and Matthias Kuhlmey in New Yorkjoined separately from UBS, bringing the firm’s tally, in a little over a year of operation, to 17 advisors with about $15 billion in assets – including 10 teams from the wirehouses or other big-name brokerages.

“We’ll have new people coming aboard in December or just after the New Year,” says Elliot Weissbluth, HighTower’s CEO. “We expect to be at between $50 billion to $100 billion in assets in the next two to four years.”

The goal sounds ambitious, even though the firm has said it is focusing on advisors with $300 million or more in client assets. It added a big chunk of its assets this year with a single advisor team led by Richard Saperstein that had run about $10 billion in client accounts at Bear Stearns.

But Weissbluth says HighTower expects to grab its fair share of the increasing number of large-book wirehouse advisors who are leaving the brokerage environment. The absolute number of advisors leaving remains small – in the hundreds – out of the universe of more than 50,000 wirehouse advisors, but it has nevertheless been growing rapidly.

“The wirehouses are our core target,” he adds. “We look for the elite brokers inside the wirehouses who have made the decision they would like to leave. We want to be on their short list.”

The idea that wirehouse advisors are willing to move is fueling business initiatives at dozens of custodians, managers, advisory firms, and service providers this year. And on Friday, Charles Schwab & Co. released the results of its survey of 200 wirehouse advisors about their attitudes on leaving the brokerage world for an independent firm, and it found that nearly half would “consider” such a move. Schwab is a large custodian that aims to attract brokerage advisors who decide to go independent to its platform. HighTower uses the platforms at Schwab and another large custodian, Fidelity Investments, for investments, custody and other services.

HighTower’s own traction was rapid in its first six months as it added 15 advisors through May. It had a dormant recruiting stretch until adding the two UBS advisors, but Weissbluth says the pause was planned because HighTower undertook a time-consuming effort to set up a clearing infrastructure through JPMorgan, particularly to benefit Saperstein’s large practice.

“That was a big operation,” Weissbluth says. “We decided to allow for JPMorgan and HighTower to have a sufficient amount of time to make sure the infrastructure was working well between the firms. We decided to build instead of trying to build and grow at the same time over the summer.”

The HighTower model appears to promise good results, particulary because it offers an equity stake and share in the firm’s growth, says Andrew Klausner, principal at AK Advisory Partners, a Boston-based consultant. He refers to HighTower’s structure that assigns 25% of the firm’s equity to advisors who come in as partners, with shares allotted by the size of the incoming recruit’s book of business.

“I think the concept has legs,” Klausner says. “The equity option appeals to people.

HighTower’s model also calls for providing the advisors with infrastructure, platforms, and product access similar to what they had at the wirehouses, which is different than the effort required for advisors who go fully independent and start up from scratch. Klausner says having a business infrastructure in place is likely appealing to a wirehouse advisor who is eager to leave but doesn’t want to mind the details of running an office.

Klausner says he has seen other start-ups using this model, including the “equity kicker,” but none have yet matched HighTower in recruiting results. The firm now has eight locations, including “corporate offices” in New York and San Francisco that are equipped to bring in additional advisors, as well as five other offices based around regional teams in other cities.

One of the recent UBS recruits highlights another focus of the HighTower model – bringing in advisors with specialties that can in turn be offered to the clients of other partners at the firm. Kuhlmey brings over a specialty in global asset allocation and international banking, having worked as well at Julius Baer and Deutsche Bank’s private banking operations. His experience includes extensive buying and selling of foreign ordinary securities in native country currencies, an arduous process that many U.S.-based advisors don’t follow but which can offer significant benefits to certain clients.

That example adds to Saperstein’s cash management specialty and to others at the firm who focus on fixed income, Weissbluth says. “The HighTower strategy is to find really high-quality advisors, and many have developed differentiated practices,” he adds.

He says “information arbitrage” stemming from the partnership structure allows advisors to share their expertise with clients of their colleagues. Such occurrences call for the advisors to coordinate both with HighTower’s CFO to establish a revenue-sharing model as well as with the firm’s compliance team to ensure clients are well-informed about the arrangement.

AK Advisory’s Klausner says a specialist model should succeed at a firm where advisors shareequity. “In the brokerages, you’re typically relying on the home office resources,” he adds. “Here, you are relying on other producers who are experts. And, typically, in a wirehouse you’re not compensated to help anybody else. But when you have an equity stake, you have a direct incentive to grow the base of the business.”

HighTower’s recruiting haul so far also includes advisors from Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, and Goldman Sachs. Weissbluth says the advisors get most external investment products, including separately managed accounts, from Schwab and Fidelity platforms or dual contract relationships with managers.

Poll: More Investors to Ditch Active for Passive - November 18th, 2009

Published inFUNDfire – An Information Service of Money-Media, a Financial Times Company
By Gregory Shulas

Institutional investors’ increased appetite for passive products will only grow stronger in thecoming months as interest in active management continues to wane. That’s according to FundFire poll respondents.

Roughly 57%, or 212 voters, said passive strategies will have the most momentum in the near future. That made it the most popular sentiment in a FundFire poll querying readers on whether active managers will continue to lose business to their passive counterparts in the coming quarters.

The majority tally includes 14%, or 52 voters, who said passive will have a “significant” advantage in the near future. It also includes 43%, or 160 voters, who said a “moderate” amount of investors will make the active-to-passive switch. That latter choice was the survey’s most popular individual option.

In contrast, 43%, or 162 voters, indicated that investors will remain loyal, if not increasingly committed, to active management in the months ahead.

The minority tally includes 21%, or 80 voters, who see no change from before, as well as 22%, or 82 voters, who expect investors will actually emphasize active management over passive management in the near future.

FundFire has reported on how institutional investors have displayed an increased interest in passive products in the past several months. For example, the San Jose (Calif.) Police and Fire Department Retirement Plan recently decided to move more than $250 million worth of largecap  equities into passive products as part of a larger asset allocation shift. Meanwhile, a recent survey from Greenwich Associates found that one in five investors have relocated money away from active managers, up from 4% last year. Further, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System has been debating the merits of active versus passive management.

Andy Klausner, founder of AK Advisory Partners, a strategic consultancy serving asset managers and advisors, says he’s not surprised by the poll’s results due to how many industry professionals are still “shell-shocked” from the past year’s events.

“One popular theme has been that active no longer works and that passive makes more sense. However, I think that this is more of a reactive mentality,” he says. “Especially since the markets have come back, I would have expected a little more support for the active side. What is probably clouding the issue is the fact that even though markets have rebounded, the general economy is not doing that well so people are still nervous.”

As of 3 p.m. Tuesday, 374 voters had taken part in the FundFire survey.

Participants were self-selected and only able to vote once. The survey is an unscientific sampling of FundFire’s audience, which consists of asset managers, institutional investors, consultants, financial advisors and service providers.

Poll: Blackrock-Barclays Merger Most Likely to Succeed - November 4th, 2009

Published in Ignites – An Information Service of Money-Media, a Financial Times Company
By Gregory Shulas

The BlackRock-Barclays Global Investors combination is the merger most likely to generate the most success when compared to the other big industry deals. That’s according to a plurality of Ignites poll respondents.

Roughly 47%, or 308 voters, said BlackRock-BGI has the greatest business opportunities ahead of it. That made it the top choice in the Ignites survey, which polled readers on which industry M&A deal will collect the most new assets and retain the most existing clients over time.

Voters said the deal with the second most growth potential is Invesco-Van Kampen Investments, which received 19% of the vote, or 125 votes.

Meanwhile, the Ameriprise Financial-Columbia Management deal garnered 15% or 98 votes putting it in third place. The Wells Fargo-Evergreen Investments deal collected 14%, or 89 voters, to finish in fourth place.

Macquarie Group-Delaware Investments finished last, with roughly 5%, or 32 votes.

Andy Klausner, founder of strategic consultancy AK Advisory Partners, says the high confidence in the BlackRock-BGI deal reflects the name recognition of the New York-based acquirer as well as the respect the firm’s risk management prowess commands.

“The Ameriprise-Columbia Management deal dragged on for quite awhile and that probably left some readers with questions. The other deals are recognizable names, but overall I think the quality of the BlackRock franchise is probably what influenced people the most,” Klausner says. Further, lack of name recognition probably hurt Macquarie Group-Delaware Investments’showing in the poll, he adds.

BlackRock announced in June that it would acquire Barclays Global Investors for $13.5 billion. The transaction gives New York-based BlackRock access to iShares, an ETF market leader.

Industry observers have described BlackRock-BGI as the future model of success in asset management, noting BlackRock’s strong active management capabilities and BGI’s rich passive product mix.

The most recent major deal was Invesco’s purchase of Morgan Stanley’s retail asset management business, including the Van Kampen Investments unit. Under the $1.5 billion deal, Invesco pays $500 million in cash and gives Morgan Stanley a 9.4% stake. The end result will create a fund complex with roughly $536 billion in assets.

That deal came within weeks of Ameriprise Financial’s announcement that it will pay between $900 million and $1.2 billion for the long-only mutual fund unit of Bank of America’s Columbia Management.